Claims

Meta-analyses indicate the flipped classroom approach has a small effect on learning outcomes, which the authors attribute partly to varying design quality

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Meta-analyses of FC implementation indicate that the effect size of the FC approach on learning outcomes across studies has been small. → Yan Shen 2025

Evidence

Yan Shen 2025

Yan Shen, Dan Spencer, Jennifer Tagsold, Hyunsong Kim. (2025). Integrating cognition, self-regulation, motivation, and metacognition: a framework of post-pandemic flipped classroom design. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10485-y

q2 · i? · design · r1

Narrative review statement reporting multiple meta-analyses (Cheng et al. 2019; Låg & Sæle 2019; van Alten et al. 2019) finding "the effect size of the FC approach on learning outcomes across studies has been small". No specific effect size value is printed, so no magnitude is coded. The review attributes the finding to the cited meta-analyses.

"Meta-analyses of FC implementation indicate that the effect size of the FC approach on learning outcomes across studies has been small (e.g., Cheng et al., 2019; Låg & Sæle, 2019; van Alten et al., 2019)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.