Claims

Students generally resisted learning topics on their own outside the classroom and preferred instructor-led learning in class

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interview data showed students resisted learning topics independently outside class and preferred learning from the instructor inside class; four students suggested learning topics from the instructor instead of studying them outside the classroom. → Cabi 2018

Evidence

Cabi 2018

Emine Cabi. (2018). The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Academic Achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1185114

q2 · i? · causal · r2

An author interpretation drawn from the focus-group interviews with 18 students. Suggested solutions quoted in the article include "Instead of studying the topics outside the classroom, I would like to learn them from the instructor ."

"Our findings also reveal that in general , students resist learning the topics on their own outside the classroom in the FC Model . Instead they prefer learning the topics from the instructor inside the class."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.