Claims

Performance feedback supported skill accuracy and was equally effective when provided by an educator as by automated means in a virtual simulation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Included studies reported performance feedback supported skill accuracy, and educator-provided feedback was equally effective as automated feedback in a virtual simulation of clinical decision-making. → Bower K 2026

Evidence

Bower K 2026

Bower K, Scrivener K, Larkins S, Seaton C, Carlisle K. (2026). Technology-based teaching to support health students’ clinical skills in stroke recovery: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08709-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

Content-analysis finding from the review's synthesis; it reports feedback "was equally effective when provided by an educator as by automated means in a virtual simulation of clinical decision-making", attributed to the cited included study.

"Performance feedback supported skill accuracy [43, 54]. This was equally effective when provided by an educator as by automated means in a virtual simulation of clinical decision-making [64]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.