Claims

Correctness and informative feedback with appropriate challenge fostered competence and autonomy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Check buttons with correctness and informative feedback increased participant confidence and supported perceptions of competence. → Shank 2025

Evidence

Shank 2025

Shank, E., Tang, H., & Morris, W. (2025). Motivation in online course design using self-determination theory: an action research study in a secondary mathematics course. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10410-9

q2 · i? · design · r2

Theme 2 from inductive interview analysis; checking answers was the most-coded category (61 codes), indicating strong participant confidence gains from self-check features.

"correctness and informative feedback, provided with an appropriate level of challenge, may have fostered competence and autonomy, thereby increasing motivation"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id feedback-features-fostered-competence-autonomy
title Correctness and informative feedback with appropriate challenge fostered competence and autonomy
description Correctness and informative feedback with appropriate challenge fostered competence and autonomy
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — shank-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.