Students aware of the GenAI feedback source reported no attitude change, while unaware students varied between content-focused acceptance and conditional willingness to reconsider¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? All five students who identified the feedback as AI-generated reported no attitude change; unaware students split across would-not-change, conditional/unsure, and would-change responses. → Yilmaz 2026
Evidence¶
Yilmaz 2026¶
Yilmaz, M., Temur, H. B., Emmungil, L., Çelik, E., Gauthier, A., & Cukurova, M. (2026). Supporting self-regulated learning through generative AI feedback in online higher education: the importance of student perceptions of the source of feedback. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 23(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00592-y
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Thematic analysis of open-ended responses from 17 treatment-group students (κ = .830), yielding four themes: Awareness-Stable Perception, Unaware-but Content-Focused, Unaware-but Open to Change, and Unaware-Would Reconsider if Aware.
"Among students who were aware of the feedback source, all (n = 5) stated that their attitude toward the feedback did not change, even though they knew it was GenAI-generated"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Aware externals accounted for the conditioning effect, while aware internals, unaware subjects, and controls showed essentially no change — related
- I-E scale scores correlate with conditioning performance for aware subjects but not for unaware subjects — related
- Teachers adjusted their OCF provision in response to learner reactions, providing feedback when accepted and stopping when it was challenged or ignored — related
- Teachers' attitudes towards oral corrective feedback are guided mainly by considerations of students' feelings, which override cognitive and other components — related
- Students express willingness to integrate GenAI in learning and future careers, and willingness correlates with knowledge and frequency of use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
feedback-source-awareness-attitude-themes |
title |
Students aware of the GenAI feedback source reported no attitude change, while unaware students varied between content-focused acceptance and conditional willingness to reconsider |
description |
Students aware of the GenAI feedback source reported no attitude change, while unaware students varied between content-focused acceptance and conditional willingness to reconsider |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yilmaz-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.