Feedback type did not affect whether students solved assignments; solution rates were very similar across all conditions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Solution rates were very similar across all feedback types and the compiler-errors-only condition, so feedback type did not affect whether students solved the assignment. → Tsvetomila Mihaylova 2026
Evidence¶
Tsvetomila Mihaylova 2026¶
Tsvetomila Mihaylova, Evanfiya Logacheva, Arto Hellas, Jing Fan, Francisco Castro, Bita Akram, Narges Norouzi, Peter Brusilovsky, Juho Leinonen. (2026). The Effects of Structured LLM-Generated Feedback on Programming Assignment Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16933 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.16933
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive comparison of solved percentages per feedback type (Table 8): No Feedback 98.1%, General 98.7%, Single-Issue 98.5%, Diagnostic 99.2%. The article reports these as descriptive rates with no significance test.
"Very similar solution rate was observed for all the feedback types, as well as the case where only compiler errors were shown, therefore the different feedback types did not affect whether the students solve the assignment."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Feedback improves learning by a medium amount on average, but its effect varies widely with the information it carries, and a substantial share of feedback effects are negative — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- All three LLM-generated feedback types are associated with faster time to solution than a compiler-errors-only baseline, with Single-Issue Feedback showing the largest reduction — related
- MAB assignment yields higher average rewards (student outcomes) than uniform random assignment during experiments — related
- Attempt-reduction patterns differed across course parts: Diagnostic and General Feedback were associated with fewer attempts for New Content, Single-Issue for Old Content — related
- Feedback effects on time to solution did not differ significantly between novice and advanced students, though predicted trends suggest feedback was more beneficial for advanced students — related
- Advanced students showed reduced attempts with all hint types, while novices did not clearly benefit and made slightly more submissions with Single-Issue Feedback — related
- All three LLM feedback types credibly reduced attempts to success relative to the baseline, with the largest reduction for Diagnostic Feedback — related
- Feedback effectiveness varied by content recency: guidance-heavy feedback performed less consistently on newer material released after the model's knowledge cutoff — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
feedback-type-no-effect-solution-rates |
title |
Feedback type did not affect whether students solved assignments; solution rates were very similar across all conditions |
description |
Feedback type did not affect whether students solved assignments; solution rates were very similar across all conditions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tsvetomila-mihaylova-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.