Claims

Female students reported higher learning agency than male students after controlling for GenAI literacy and year of study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Gender was significantly associated with learning agency, with female students reporting higher levels than male students. → Yang J 2026

Evidence

Yang J 2026

Yang J, Liu X, Zhao W and Wang T (2026). GenAI literacy and GenAI-assisted self-regulated learning behaviors: the roles of learning agency and challenge emotions. Front. Psychol. 17:1902668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1902668

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Secondary finding from the mediation model's covariates in the survey of 434 undergraduates; the article reports the gender difference as significant but prints no effect size for it, so no magnitude is reported here.

"Female students reported higher levels of learning agency than male students after controlling for GenAI literacy and year of study."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id female-higher-learning-agency-genai-contexts
title Female students reported higher learning agency than male students after controlling for GenAI literacy and year of study
description Female students reported higher learning agency than male students after controlling for GenAI literacy and year of study
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yang-j-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.