Only six reviewed studies combined peer feedback with feedback from other sources¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Only six of the 73 reviewed studies combined feedback from peers with feedback from other sources such as teachers, self, or computers. → Xingshi Gao 2024
Evidence¶
Xingshi Gao 2024¶
Xingshi Gao, Omid Noroozi, Judith Gulikers, Harm J.A. Biemans, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem. (2024). A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588
q3 · i? · review · r2
Systematic review of 73 articles on online peer feedback; the review reports "Only six studies combined feedback from peers with feedback from other sources", identifying multi-source feedback as a rarely studied configuration in online higher education settings.
"Only six studies combined feedback from peers with feedback from other sources."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Most students preferred combined peer and AI feedback over either source alone, and rated peer and ChatGPT feedback as similarly useful — related
- Teacher feedback produced larger first-task score gains that dropped 32.8% by the second task, while AI-assisted peer feedback gains remained stable (a learning-curve effect) — related
- Students who continued feedback conversations with ChatGPT perceived more utility in AI feedback than one-shot users — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
few-studies-combine-multi-source-feedback |
title |
Only six reviewed studies combined peer feedback with feedback from other sources |
description |
Only six reviewed studies combined peer feedback with feedback from other sources |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — xingshi-gao-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.