Form-focused instruction combined with prompts is more effective than FFI combined with recasts or no feedback, especially on written tasks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Among FFI classes, the prompts condition outperformed the recasts and no-feedback conditions, most clearly on written tasks and to a lesser degree on oral tasks. → Roy Lyster 2004
Evidence¶
Roy Lyster 2004¶
Roy Lyster. (2004). DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Volume 26, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Classroom comparison in which each of the three FFI teachers implemented a different feedback treatment: "recasts, prompts, or no feedback." Results favored prompts over recasts and no feedback, with the advantage strongest on written tasks and weaker on oral tasks.
"Results of the written tasks in particular, and to a lesser degree the oral tasks, revealed that FFI is more effective when combined with prompts than with recasts or no feedback, as a means of enabling L2 learners to acquire rule-based representations of grammatical gender and to proceduralize their knowledge of these emerging forms."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Producing modified output involving developmentally advanced question forms in response to negative feedback is the only significant predictor of ESL question development — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Prompts were overall more effective than recasts as corrective feedback for L2 grammar learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Corrective feedback on second-language errors has a significant effect on L2 development that is maintained on delayed tests — a broader claim this one bears on
- Higher task complexity is associated with lower written production of the target form among child learners receiving recasts — related
- Child EFL learners receiving recasts in task-based lessons improve their production of third person singular -s from pretest to posttest, in a study with no no-recast comparison group — related
- Task complexity shows no significant effect on child learners' oral production of the target form when receiving recasts — related
- Form-focused instruction on noun endings significantly increases French immersion students' ability to correctly assign grammatical gender, with gains maintained on delayed posttests — related
- Traditional form-focused instruction produces significant gains in production but not in comprehension — related
- The provision of negative feedback alone did not significantly predict ESL question development in this study — related
- Corrective feedback facilitates L2 grammatical development, with explicit feedback stronger immediately and implicit feedback better maintained over time — a broader claim this one bears on
- High-proficiency L2 learners benefited equally from prompts and recasts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ffi-with-prompts-beats-recasts-for-gender |
title |
Form-focused instruction combined with prompts is more effective than FFI combined with recasts or no feedback, especially on written tasks |
description |
Form-focused instruction combined with prompts is more effective than FFI combined with recasts or no feedback, especially on written tasks |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2004 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — roy-lyster-2004 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.