Stakeholder participants largely endorsed that the co-designed pedagogical design principles foster learning and motivation towards STEM¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In focus group 2, 94.34% of participants (n = 137) agreed or strongly agreed that the presented pedagogical design principles foster learning and motivation towards STEM. → Mäkelä 2022

Evidence¶

Mäkelä 2022¶

Mäkelä, T., Fenyvesi, K., Kankaanranta, M., Pnevmatikos, D., & Christodoulou, P. (2022). Co-designing a pedagogical framework and principles for a hybrid STEM learning environment. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10114-y

q2 · i? · design · r2

Member-check survey using a gamified Kahoot tool during focus group 2 sessions in all five project countries, serving as respondent validation of the framework. "94.34% of all the participants (n = 137)" agreed or strongly agreed; percentages are descriptive, no inferential test reported.

"In focus group 2, after presenting the pedagogical framework created based on the feedback from focus group 1, 94.34% of all the participants (n = 137) in focus group 2 either agreed (50%) or strongly agreed (44.34%) with the statement, "the presented pedagogical design principles foster learning and motivation towards STEM"."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A university-wide Deliberative Democracy process enabled higher education stakeholders to integrate situated knowledge through structured dialogue to co-produce AAI-EdTech ethical principles — related
• Stakeholders viewed the co-produced principles as distinct across organisational, sectoral and policy levels — related