Claims

Field-dependent learners are more sensitive to task type: they perform best of all subgroups under dynamic instruction and worst under static instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? FD Dynamic learners achieved the largest post-test mean (29.7801) and FD Static learners the smallest (24.9354), a significant difference (p = .000). → Gholam Reza Haji Pour Nezhad & Nasrin Shokrpour 2012

Evidence

Gholam Reza Haji Pour Nezhad & Nasrin Shokrpour 2012

Gholam Reza Haji Pour Nezhad & Nasrin Shokrpour. (2012). The Impact of Task Type and Cognitive Style on Vocabulary Learning. English Language Teaching, 5(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p17

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Tukey HSD post-hoc comparisons of the four subgroups in the randomized controlled study showed FD Dynamic significantly better than FD Static (p = .000); the article reports this as the widest spread among all subgroups.

"the largest and smallest means belong to the FD Dynamic group with a mean of 29.7801 and FD Static group with a mean of 24.9354"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.