Teachers rated FieldTripOrganizer higher than Klarna.Trips on support, autonomy, anxiety reduction, and motivation during field trip planning¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 66.67% of participants rated FieldTripOrganizer as useful support for organizing a field trip (M=3.89), versus M=1.61 for Klarna.Trips. → Noemi Mauro 2024 q2 i? Using FieldTripOrganizer decreased anxiety in 55.5% of cases (ratings ≥ 4, M=3.39), while Klarna.Trips failed this goal in 77.78% of cases (M=1.89). → Noemi Mauro 2024 (2) q2 i? FieldTripOrganizer motivated teachers in 77.78% of cases (15 users rated ≥ 4, M=4.06) versus M=1.94 for Klarna.Trips. → Noemi Mauro 2024 (3)

Evidence¶

Noemi Mauro 2024¶

Noemi Mauro, Liliana Ardissono, Federica Cena, Livio Scarpinati, Gianluca Torta. (2024). An Intelligent Support System to Help Teachers Plan Field Trips. Int J Artif Intell Educ 34, 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00366-x

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-task questionnaire (Q11) administered after each task in the 18-teacher within-subjects study; the article reports "Most participants (66.67%) claimed that our application is useful as a support" with M=3.89 versus M=1.61 for the baseline.

"Most participants (66.67%) claimed that our application is useful as a support to organize a field trip (ratings ≥ 4, M=3.89). Only one person claimed that it was useless. In comparison, Klarna.Trips was rated very low (ratings ≤ 3, M=1.61) by 17 participants out of 18."

Noemi Mauro 2024 (2)¶

Noemi Mauro, Liliana Ardissono, Federica Cena, Livio Scarpinati, Gianluca Torta. (2024). An Intelligent Support System to Help Teachers Plan Field Trips. Int J Artif Intell Educ 34, 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00366-x

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Anxiety item (Q13) of the post-task questionnaire in the same study; the article reports the anxiety-reduction goal "was reached in 55.5% of the cases" for FieldTripOrganizer versus failure in 77.78% of cases with Klarna.Trips.

"According to the answers, the goal was reached in 55.5% of the cases, with ratings ≥ 4 (M=3.39). Only 1 person stated that the application did not work for this goal; however, in comparison, this happened in the 77.78% of cases when using Klarna.Trips (M=1.89)."

Noemi Mauro 2024 (3)¶

Noemi Mauro, Liliana Ardissono, Federica Cena, Livio Scarpinati, Gianluca Torta. (2024). An Intelligent Support System to Help Teachers Plan Field Trips. Int J Artif Intell Educ 34, 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00366-x

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Motivation item (Q14) of the post-task questionnaire; the article reports FieldTripOrganizer "motivated teachers in organizing science field trips in 77.78% of cases" (M=4.06) against M=1.94 for the baseline.

"FieldTripOrganizer motivated teachers in organizing science field trips in 77.78% of cases: 15 users gave a rating ≥ 4 (M=4.06). Differently, Klarna.Trips received a high score from a single participant (M=1.94)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a user study with 18 science teachers, FieldTripOrganizer was rated more usable than the Klarna.Trips baseline tour planner — related
• Perceived benefits of FieldTripOrganizer were somewhat larger for teachers with intermediate/low ICT expertise than for advanced users — related