The reviewer judges the figure 12 distribution-curve comparison vitiated by unequal group totals¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q1
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The reviewer's methodological judgment is that the distribution-curve comparison on figure 12 is vitiated by unequal group totals. → Pintner 1921
Evidence¶
Pintner 1921¶
Pintner, R. (1921). New Publications in Educational Psychology and Related Fields of Education. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22New+Publications+in+Educational+Psychology+and+Related+Fields+of+Education%22
q1 · i? · review · r?
Methodological critique in the review of the New Haven survey's results shown on figures 12 and 13: "the comparison of the distribution curves on figure 12 is vitiated by the difference in the totals of the two groups compared."
"Furthermore, the comparison of the distribution curves on figure 12 is vitiated by the difference in the totals of the two groups compared."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
figure12-distribution-comparison-vitiated-unequal-totals |
title |
The reviewer judges the figure 12 distribution-curve comparison vitiated by unequal group totals |
description |
The reviewer judges the figure 12 distribution-curve comparison vitiated by unequal group totals |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1921 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pintner-1921 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.