FiMS relate more strongly than GMS to reading, writing, mathematics, general academics and cognition, but not to language; GMS show no significant link to general academic skills¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? GMS showed no statistically significant association with general academic skills (r = .171, p = .101), while FiMS did (r = .399). → Karle 2026
Evidence¶
Karle 2026¶
Karle, V. L., Suggate, S. P., Winter, R., & Stoeger, H. (2026). When Fine is Large and Gross is Small: A Meta-Analysis of Links Between Fine and Gross Motor Skills with Academic-Cognitive Skills. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10161-4
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
In the domain model, all FiMS and GMS associations were significantly above zero "except for the association between GMS and general academic skills" (Table 3: GMS r = .171, p = .101; FiMS r = .399, p = .008).
"As Table 4 shows, the effect sizes were all significantly above zero for both FiMS and GMS, except for the association between GMS and general academic skills."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fine motor skills correlate more strongly with overall academic-cognitive skills (r = .302) than gross motor skills (r = .170) in children aged 3–16 — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The FiMS–GMS difference is larger for intelligence than for executive functions, where both motor skills show similar moderate links — related
- Among motor subskills, general FiMS and graphomotor skills show the strongest links to overall academic-cognitive skills, and miscellaneous GMS and balance the strongest among GMS subskills — related
- Writing shows the strongest FMS correlation among academic domains, exceeding reading — related
- FMS subdomain correlations vary within academic domains: nonword reading strongest, letter reading weakest, intelligence strongest among cognitive skills — related
- MASEM suggests cognitive skills partially mediate the link between FMS and academic skills, which drops from r = .334 to .200 — related
- Early fine motor skills predict later arithmetic skills in most longitudinal studies, but not when executive functions are controlled — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
fims-gms-domain-specific-associations |
title |
FiMS relate more strongly than GMS to reading, writing, mathematics, general academics and cognition, but not to language; GMS show no significant link to general academic skills |
description |
FiMS relate more strongly than GMS to reading, writing, mathematics, general academics and cognition, but not to language; GMS show no significant link to general academic skills |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — karle-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.