Claims

Financial incentives for effort tasks show no statistically significant impact on overall GCSE attainment in Maths or English

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q4 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i0 In a cluster randomised controlled trial, financial incentives for effort tasks did not produce a statistically significant improvement in GCSE Maths or English points scores (effect sizes 0.04 and 0.02). → Sibieta et al. 2014

Evidence

Sibieta et al. 2014

Luke Sibieta, Ellen Greaves, Barbara Sianesi. (2014). Increasing Pupil Motivation: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581249

q4 · i0 · causal · r2

Cluster randomised controlled trial with randomisation at school level; 15 financial-incentive schools compared with 33 control schools, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis using fully-interacted linear matching. The report states the effect sizes "are not statistically significant from zero" and that the evaluation "can rule out medium to large effects on pupil attainment."

"The small positive effect sizes detected – 0.04 and 0.02 in Maths and English respectively – are not statistically significant from zero. There is also no evidence of a statistically significant effect on GCSE Science."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.