Claims

A 1-week financial fitness camp raised financial knowledge of low-income 8th graders by roughly 12 percentage points on a pretest–posttest design

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Mean posttest–pretest gain for the 83 camp attendees was 11.75 percentage points, statistically significant at p < .05. → Bhattacharya et al. 2016

Evidence

Bhattacharya et al. 2016

Radha Bhattacharya, Andrew Gill, and Denise Stanley. (2016). The Effectiveness of Financial Literacy Instruction: The Role of Individual Development Accounts Participation and the Intensity of Instruction. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, Volume 27, Number 1, 2016, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.27.1.20

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest–posttest evaluation of a 1-week camp using a 44-question financial literacy test (KR-20 of 0.7 pretest, 0.9 posttest) with 83 students. The article reports the gain "is significantly different from zero (p , .05)"; no standardized effect size is printed.

"Table 2 shows the mean difference between posttest and pretest scores for the entire sample of students is 11.75 percentage points and this increase is significantly different from zero (p , .05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.