Claims

Fine motor skills training improves children's arithmetic skills in some trials but not others

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2–q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In a randomized controlled trial, FMS training improved both FMS and arithmetic skills, with improvements the review describes as medium to large effect sizes without printed values. → Maëlle Neveu 2023 q2 i? Piano training improved FMS and arithmetic jointly in one study, but two other FMS training studies reported no arithmetic improvement despite gains in FMS, self-esteem, or visuospatial working memory. → Maëlle Neveu 2023 (2)

Evidence

Maëlle Neveu 2023

Maëlle Neveu, Marie Geurten, Nancy Durieux, Laurence Rousselle. (2023). Finger Use and Arithmetic Skills in Children and Adolescents: a Scoping Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09722-8

q3 · i? · review · r3

Randomized controlled trial (Asakawa et al., 2019) in which school-aged TD participants were trained in fine motor skills; training improved FMS and arithmetic, unlike controls, with improvements the review describes as "medium to large effect sizes" but no numeric value printed.

"The results showed that children in the training group improved not only their FMS but also their arithmetic skills, unlike those in the control group. The improvements had medium to large effect sizes."

Maëlle Neveu 2023 (2)

Maëlle Neveu, Marie Geurten, Nancy Durieux, Laurence Rousselle. (2023). Finger Use and Arithmetic Skills in Children and Adolescents: a Scoping Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09722-8

q2 · i? · review · r3

Non-randomized trials of FMS training (piano lessons for TD children; training for children with DCD) reported no arithmetic improvement despite enhancement in FMS, self-esteem, or visuospatial working memory.

"Conversely, two other studies reported no improvement in arithmetic skills following FMS training in children with TD (Costa-Giomi, 2004; piano lessons) or DCD (Alloway & Warner, 2008), but there was an enhancement in FMS, self-esteem, or visuospatial working memory."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id fine-motor-training-arithmetic-mixed
title Fine motor skills training improves children's arithmetic skills in some trials but not others
description Fine motor skills training improves children's arithmetic skills in some trials but not others
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — maëlle-neveu-2023, maëlle-neveu-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.