Starting with an example strongly benefits first practice problem performance, with a larger effect for gifted students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 EPEP students outperformed PEPE students on the first practice problem for both gifted (d = 2.07) and nongifted (d = 1.06) students, with a significant Giftedness × Task Sequence interaction. → Coppens 2019
Evidence¶
Coppens 2019¶
Coppens, L. C., Hoogerheide, V., Snippe, E. M., Flunger, B., & van Gog, T. (2019). Effects of problem–example and example–problem pairs on gifted and nongifted primary school students' learning. Instructional Science, 47, 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09484-3
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
ANCOVA on first practice problem showed a significant interaction, F(1, 121) = 15.94, p < .001; Bonferroni-corrected t-tests showed "performance on the first problem was better for those in the EPEP condition than those in the PEPE condition" for both groups.
"performance on the first problem was better for those in the EPEP condition than those in the PEPE condition, both for gifted students, t(63) = 7.94, p < .001, d = 2.07, and for nongifted students, t(59) = 2.89, p = .005, d = 1.06"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- General Cognitive Ability — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Task sequence effects on mental effort reverse between learning phase and transfer test — related
- Example–problem pairs are more efficient than problem–example pairs for both gifted and nongifted primary school students — related
- Example–problem pairs raise perceived competence but not perceived autonomy or enjoyment — related
- Gifted primary students report higher need for cognition, perceived competence and perceived autonomy than nongifted students — related
- Giftedness interacts significantly with instruction type on the learning and recall outcomes in the 2×2×2 study — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
first-practice-problem-sequence-interaction |
title |
Starting with an example strongly benefits first practice problem performance, with a larger effect for gifted students |
description |
Starting with an example strongly benefits first practice problem performance, with a larger effect for gifted students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — coppens-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.