Claims

Based on teacher report, 46% of intervention children versus 31% of control children recovered or improved on the SSiS Autism subscale, a non-significant difference

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Six intervention children (46%) recovered or improved versus four control children (31%) on teacher-reported SSiS Autism; the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.43, p = .513, OR = 1.7). → Frey 2015

Evidence

Frey 2015

Frey, A. J., Small, J. W., Feil, E. G., Seeley, J. R., Walker, H. M., & Forness, S. (2015). First Step to Success: Applications to Preschoolers at Risk of Developing Autism Spectrum Disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(4), 397–407. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1082560

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Responder analysis on teacher-reported SSiS Autism subscale among the 13 of 17 children in each condition above the normative cutoff at baseline. The article reports χ2 = 0.43, p = .513, OR = 1.7 [0.4, 8.7].

"Thus, based on teacher report, six (46%) children from the interven- tion condition recovered or improved as compared to four (31%) children in the control condition ( /H92732 /H110050.43, p /H11005.513, OR[95% C.I.] /H110051.7[0.4,8.7])."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.