Claims

There is little prior evidence on the validity of principal evaluation measures, and this is the first study linking practice ratings to credible value-added measures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors assert that little evidence exists on the validity of principal evaluation measures and that their study is the first to find such a correlation with credible value-added measures. → Moira McCullough 2016

Evidence

Moira McCullough 2016

Moira McCullough, Stephen Lipscomb, Hanley Chiang, Brian Gill. (2016). Do Principals' Professional Practice Ratings Reflect Their Contributions to Student Achievement? Evidence from Pennsylvania's Framework for Leadership. Working Paper 46. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/do-principals-professional-practice-ratings-reflect-their-contributions-to-student-achievement

q1 · i? · associational · r?

Authors' framing statement about the research gap: although states and districts have begun evaluating principals, "there is little evidence on the validity of principal evaluation measures." This is the authors' interpretation, not a tested result.

"This is the first study to find evidence that ratings of principals' professional practice are correlated with credible measures of principals' contributions to student achievement."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id first-study-principal-practice-ratings-value-added-validity
title There is little prior evidence on the validity of principal evaluation measures, and this is the first study linking practice ratings to credible value-added measures
description There is little prior evidence on the validity of principal evaluation measures, and this is the first study linking practice ratings to credible value-added measures
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
recheck_by 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — moira-mccullough-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.