MI-based strategy improves five intelligence types while logical-mathematical intelligence decreases, partly due to instrument bias¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Experimental-group students improved primarily in intrapersonal, interpersonal, kinesthetic, visual-spatial and musical intelligences, while logical-mathematical intelligence tended to remain or decrease. → Winarti 2019
q2 i? The logical-mathematical decrease may reflect the instrument: 5 of its 7 items concern numbers and calculation rather than logic, so scientific-logic gains were not captured. → Winarti 2019 (2)
Evidence¶
Winarti 2019¶
Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and Science Process Skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.404
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive analysis of MI sub-scores before and after the 12-week quasi-experiment; the experimental group improved in five named intelligence types while control-group MI scores did not improve. No effect sizes are printed for the sub-scores.
"In the experimental group, students' MI scores improved primarily in five types of intelligences, namely intrapersonal, interpersonal, kinesthetic, visual spatial, and musical intelligences. Linguistic intelligence was slightly increased, while the mathematical-logic intelligence tends to remain."
Winarti 2019 (2)¶
Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and Science Process Skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.404
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Authors' interpretation of the logical-mathematical decrease: the MI instrument's 7 items for that intelligence are weighted toward calculation, so development of scientific logic was not captured. This is an author explanation, not a tested result.
"From the 7 items, 5 items are related to numbers, calculation, and interest in mathematics, and only two items relate to the ability of logic."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- General Cognitive Ability — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.