Claims

MI-based strategy improves five intelligence types while logical-mathematical intelligence decreases, partly due to instrument bias

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group students improved primarily in intrapersonal, interpersonal, kinesthetic, visual-spatial and musical intelligences, while logical-mathematical intelligence tended to remain or decrease. → Winarti 2019 q2 i? The logical-mathematical decrease may reflect the instrument: 5 of its 7 items concern numbers and calculation rather than logic, so scientific-logic gains were not captured. → Winarti 2019 (2)

Evidence

Winarti 2019

Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and Science Process Skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.404

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive analysis of MI sub-scores before and after the 12-week quasi-experiment; the experimental group improved in five named intelligence types while control-group MI scores did not improve. No effect sizes are printed for the sub-scores.

"In the experimental group, students' MI scores improved primarily in five types of intelligences, namely intrapersonal, interpersonal, kinesthetic, visual spatial, and musical intelligences. Linguistic intelligence was slightly increased, while the mathematical-logic intelligence tends to remain."

Winarti 2019 (2)

Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and Science Process Skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.404

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation of the logical-mathematical decrease: the MI instrument's 7 items for that intelligence are weighted toward calculation, so development of scientific logic was not captured. This is an author explanation, not a tested result.

"From the 7 items, 5 items are related to numbers, calculation, and interest in mathematics, and only two items relate to the ability of logic."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.