Claims

Five null studies with spacing but no rest and dissimilar materials showed neither spacing nor interleaving effects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Five studies that used spacing between different concepts with no rest-from-deliberate-learning and very dissimilar materials found neither a spacing effect nor an interleaving effect. → Ouhao Chen & Fred Paas & John Sweller 2021

Evidence

Ouhao Chen & Fred Paas & John Sweller 2021

Ouhao Chen & Fred Paas & John Sweller. (2021). Spacing and Interleaving Effects Require Distinct Theoretical Bases: a Systematic Review Testing the Cognitive Load and Discriminative-Contrast Hypotheses. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09613-w

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review analysis of five null-effect studies, including Ostrow and Heffernan (2015) with knowledgeable learners and De Croock and Van Merriënboer (2007) with dissimilar troubleshooting scenarios. The review reports "There were five studies that (1)all used spacing between different concepts or skills with no rest-from-deliberate-learning, resulting in no spacing effect."

"There were five studies that (1)all used spacing between different concepts or skills with no rest-from-deliberate-learning, resulting in no spacing effect; (2) all used materials that were very dissimilar, resulting in no need to contrast and discriminate materials and so finding no interleaving effect."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id five-null-studies-support-both-hypotheses
title Five null studies with spacing but no rest and dissimilar materials showed neither spacing nor interleaving effects
description Five null studies with spacing but no rest and dissimilar materials showed neither spacing nor interleaving effects
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ouhao-chen-fred-paas-john-sweller-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.