Students in the FLEX blended learning format rated the learning environment positively across all surveyed dimensions¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In an end-of-term online survey (n = 117), FLEX students showed positive perceptions in all dimensions, with agreement (categories 3–5) ranging from 73.0% to 84.6%. → Claude Müller 2018

Evidence¶

Claude Müller 2018¶

Claude Müller, Michael Stahl, Mark Alder, Maximilian Müller. (2018). Learning Effectiveness and Students' Perceptions in a Flexible Learning Course. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 21(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1208426

q2 · i? · associational · r1

End-of-term online survey of the FLEX pilot group (n = 117) using items on interest/enjoyment, structure, coherence, usability, guidance, motivation and learning outcome. The article reports "positive perceptions of FLEX in all dimensions" with agreement from 73.0% to 84.6%; usability was rated especially positively.

"The online survey results ( n = 117) show p ositive perceptions of FLEX in all dimensions, with broad agreement (response categories 3 –5) ranging from 73.0% to 84.6% (see Figure 2)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The most frequent student criticisms of FLEX concerned self-regulated learning, missing interaction, and difficulty estimating learning time — related
• Students report positive attitudes towards studying physics in the blended web-based environment — related