Claims

Most students said they would prefer to use the flipped classroom method as future teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A majority of participants reported they would prefer the flipped classroom method in appropriate subjects or classes when they become teachers. → İlknur Özpinar 2016

Evidence

İlknur Özpinar 2016

İlknur Özpinar, Arzu Aydoğan Yenmez, Semirhan Gökçe. (2016). Application of Flipped Classroom Model in the Instructional Technologies and Material Development Course. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 4, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i12.1934

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Questionnaire item asking whether students would find the method effective and prefer it as future teachers; the article prints "19 (76%) of the students said they would prefer" with 4 (16%) declining and 2 (8%) neutral.

"19 (76%) of the students said they would prefer, 4 (16%) said they would not prefer, and 2 (8%) were neutral."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.