Claims

Publication bias tests indicate the pooled flipped classroom effect is unlikely to be inflated by publication bias

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Funnel plot symmetry and the Egger test (t = 1.54, p1 = 0.07, p2 = 0.14) indicated publication bias was unlikely among the included studies. → Zhang 2021

Evidence

Zhang 2021

Zhang, Q., Cheung, E.S.T., & Cheung, C.S.T. (2021). The impact of flipped classroom on college students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis based on 20 experimental studies. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 8(2):1059-1080. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.21.re019

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Publication bias assessment (Figure 2 funnel plot plus Egger test) of the 20 included studies. The authors state the sample effect sizes were "symmetrically distributed on both sides of the average effect size", supporting robustness of the pooled estimate.

"The result showed that t = 1.54, p1 = 0.07, p2 = 0.14. Both the research data and the funnel plot indicated that the flipped classroom studies we included were less likely to have publication bias, and the combined effect size obtained was relatively robust and reliable."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.