Flipped and traditional groups did not differ in basic technology competencies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? No significant difference between groups was found on the Basic Technology Competencies Scale for Educators Inventory. → İlknur Özpinar 2016

Evidence¶

İlknur Özpinar 2016¶

İlknur Özpinar, Arzu Aydoğan Yenmez, Semirhan Gökçe. (2016). Application of Flipped Classroom Model in the Instructional Technologies and Material Development Course. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 4, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i12.1934

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Discussion-section summary of the inventory administered as a pretest to both groups (25 per group); the article reports "no significant difference between the groups" with no effect size printed.

"Basic Technology Competencies Scale for Educators Inventory was used to examine students' technological competencies and it was concluded that there was no significant difference between the groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Flipped and traditional instruction did not differ in students' technological perception scores — related
• Active methodologies show no definitive superiority over traditional teaching in undergraduate dentistry — a broader claim this one bears on
• No significant main effect of learning approach on behavioral, emotional, or cognitive engagement — related
• Remote teaching achieves competency outcomes equivalent to traditional learning for basic surgical skills in most studies — related