Claims

Undergraduate health professional students report more positive satisfaction with flipped class learning than with traditional class learning (SMD = 0.48), at low certainty

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across eight studies (n = 1696), student satisfaction with flipped class learning was positive compared to traditional class learning (SMD = 0.48). → Naing 2023

Evidence

Naing 2023

Naing, C., Whittaker, M. A., Aung, H. H., Chellappan, D. K., & Riegelman, A. (2023). The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19, e1339. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1339

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of eight studies (n = 1696) measuring student satisfaction with the method of learning at immediate post-test via self-report scales. The review reports satisfaction "was positive compared to traditional class learning" with SMD = 0.48 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.82), I² = 89%.

"Overall, student satisfaction with flipped class learning was positive compared to traditional class learning (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.82, τ 2: 0.19, I 2:89%, p < 0.00001, 8 studies n = 1696); all being low certainty of evidence."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id flipped-classroom-student-satisfaction-positive
title Undergraduate health professional students report more positive satisfaction with flipped class learning than with traditional class learning (SMD = 0.48), at low certainty
description Undergraduate health professional students report more positive satisfaction with flipped class learning than with traditional class learning (SMD = 0.48), at low certainty
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-18
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — naing-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.