Claims

Strategies that reduce fluency and increase perceived difficulty (e.g., self-testing, spaced practice) often yield superior long-term learning, contrary to student beliefs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Situations that increase processing fluency are widely believed by students to aid learning, yet strategies that decrease fluency and increase perceived difficulty often produce better long-term learning. → Andrew C. Butler & Shana K. Carpenter 2015

Evidence

Andrew C. Butler & Shana K. Carpenter 2015

Andrew C. Butler & Shana K. Carpenter. (2015). Separating Myth from Reality in Education: Introduction to the Special Issue. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9344-0

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editorial reports, citing Finn and Tauber (2015), that fluency of processing has a "pervasive and misleading effect" on students' perceptions of learning, and that difficulty-increasing strategies "often lead to superior long-term learning."

"strategies and techniques that increase the perceived difficulty of learning and decrease the sense of fluency (e.g., self-testing and spaced practice) often lead to superior long-term learning"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id fluency-misleads-judgments-of-learning
title Strategies that reduce fluency and increase perceived difficulty (e.g., self-testing, spaced practice) often yield superior long-term learning, contrary to student beliefs
description Strategies that reduce fluency and increase perceived difficulty (e.g., self-testing, spaced practice) often yield superior long-term learning, contrary to student beliefs
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — andrew-c-butler-shana-k-carpenter-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.