Fluid reasoning moderated the lockdown–self-efficacy relationship: a booster effect for students in lockdown¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? A significant lockdown × fluid reasoning interaction showed fluid reasoning yielded a significant positive role for the self-efficacy of students who were in lockdown. → Martin Andrew J. 2023

Evidence¶

Martin Andrew J. 2023¶

Martin Andrew J., Ginns Paul, Collie Rebecca J. (2023). University students in COVID-19 lockdown: The role of adaptability and fluid reasoning in supporting their academic motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101712

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Auxiliary moderation test in the SEM of 500 students, assessing lockdown status × fluid reasoning interaction terms; detailed results are in Supplementary Materials. The authors interpret it as a booster effect consistent with JD-R theory.

"moderation tests revealed a significant lockdown x fluid reasoning interaction effect for self-efficacy such that fluid reasoning yielded a significant positive role for the self-efficacy of students who were in lockdown."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Fluid reasoning significantly predicted enjoyment but not self-efficacy after accounting for adaptability and covariates — related
• Lockdown was significantly associated with higher disengagement (β = 0.12) but not with self-efficacy among university students — related