Claims

The intervention improves focus-related mindsets, self-efficacy, and (in Study 1) emotion regulation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In both studies, students reported higher growth mindset about focus and greater self-efficacy in knowing how to improve it from pre-test to post-test. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026 q2 i? In Study 1, students reported higher emotion regulation via cognitive reappraisal from pre-test to post-test. → Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)

Evidence

Michael D. Mrazek 2026

Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

Study 1 pre-post survey analysis found growth mindset and self-efficacy gains (Table 1: SMD = 0.30 and 0.58, p < .001), replicated in Study 2 (Table 2: SMD = 0.34 and 0.60). These outcomes replicated hypotheses from prior course-only research.

"From pre-test to post-test, students reported a higher growth mindset regarding their ability to focus and felt greater self-efficacy in knowing how to improve this ability (Table 1)."

Michael D. Mrazek 2026 (2)

Michael D. Mrazek, Dustyn S. Ransom, Amy R. Texter, Calvin V. Tower, Bryce A. Rutila, Thomas F. Kennedy, Elijah J. Woodson, Jonathan W. Schooler, Alissa J. Mrazek. (2026). Theory-driven design and validation of a tool to enhance academic focus. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10730-y

q2 · i? · design · r3

Study 1 measured emotion regulation with the ERQ-CA cognitive reappraisal subscale; Table 1 reports b = 0.20, p < .001, SMD = 0.24. The ERQ was removed in Study 2 to shorten the survey, so this outcome was not replicated.

"From pre-test to post-test, students reported higher levels of emotional regulation via reappraisal (Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id focus-coach-mindset-self-efficacy-emotion-regulation-gains
title The intervention improves focus-related mindsets, self-efficacy, and (in Study 1) emotion regulation
description The intervention improves focus-related mindsets, self-efficacy, and (in Study 1) emotion regulation
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — michael-d-mrazek-2026, michael-d-mrazek-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.