Four distinct LMS interaction patterns with different final marks were found among 140 undergraduates in an authentic Moodle course.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Cluster analysis of Moodle logs from 140 undergraduates identified four distinct behavioral patterns of LMS use, and these patterns were associated with different final marks. → Cerezo 2016

Evidence¶

Cerezo 2016¶

Cerezo, R., Sanchez-Santillan, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students' LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.006

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Observational log analysis of a Moodle 2.0 course with 140 undergraduates; the article reports that "four different patterns of learning with different final marks were found" using EM, k-means and the elbow method.

"After analyzing the log data gathered from a Moodle 2.0 course in which 140 undergraduate students were enrolled, four different patterns of learning with different final marks were found."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• K-means clustering of LMS log data identified two distinct SRL profiles (high and low) among online students — related
• Exploratory K-means clustering identifies four heterogeneous student AI-user profiles differing in experience, competence, usefulness, trust, and control, but the solution's optimality and stability are not established — related
• K-means clustering of K–8 students' platform trace data yields seven distinct engagement profiles — related
• Semester control-question results correlated positively (r = 0.5530) with final-test results, supporting the evaluation system's predictive accuracy — related