A comparative documentary analysis of four US mathematics curricula found substantially different types of opportunities to learn across the curricula¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Documentary analysis of four commonly used US mathematics curricula revealed substantially different types of opportunities to learn across the four programs. → Janine T. Remillard 2014

Evidence¶

Janine T. Remillard 2014¶

Janine T. Remillard, Barbara Harris, Roberto Agodini. (2014). The Influence of Curriculum Material Design on Opportunities for Student Learning. ZDM, The International Journal of Mathematics Education. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/the-influence-of-curriculum-material-design-on-opportunities-for-student-learning

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Comparative documentary analysis of four mathematics curricula commonly used in the United States, conducted by the authors. The analysis "found substantially different types of opportunities to learn across the four curricula." No effect size is printed on the source page.

"The study found substantially different types of opportunities to learn across the four curricula."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A large-scale experimental study compared the effects of the four mathematics curricula on student achievement — related
• The authors hypothesize that differences in curriculum design could explain the achievement results of the experimental study — related
• First-grade math achievement is significantly higher under Math Expressions and Saxon Math than under Investigations in Number, Data, and Space and Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Mathematics — related