Both experimental and control teachers reduced fractions errors, with greater reduction in the lesson study with resource kit group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Both experimental and control group teachers showed significant reduction in fractions errors from pre-test to post-test, with greater reduction in the experimental group. → Catherine Lewis & Rebecca Perry 2014
Evidence¶
Catherine Lewis & Rebecca Perry 2014¶
Catherine Lewis & Rebecca Perry. (2014). Lesson Study with Mathematical Resources: A Sustainable Model for Locally-led Teacher Professional Learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1046670
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Pre/post assessment of teachers' fraction knowledge in the randomised trial. Table 3 reports maths error means falling from 2.63 to 1.67 in the experimental group (t = 5.113, 72 df, p < 0.001) and from 2.20 to 1.76 in control (t = 2.568, 139 df, p < 0.05); no effect size is printed.
"Both experimental and control group teachers showed significant reduction in fractions errors, with greater reduction in the experimental group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.