Claims

The heuristic framework deliberately retains automatic performance checks opposed by instructors and students, as context-appropriate measure selection matters

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The first heuristic includes automatic performance checks despite opposition from both instructor and student groups, because real-time automatic assessment inappropriate for the MET context should not be dismissed for other contexts. → Susan Harrington and Charlott Sellberg 2026

Evidence

Susan Harrington and Charlott Sellberg 2026

Susan Harrington and Charlott Sellberg. (2026). 12 Heuristics for Learning Analytics in Simulation-Based Professional Learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9141

q1 · i? · design · r2

Authors' interpretive discussion of the top-down contribution to the framework: the first heuristic's reference to automatic performance checks reflects the importance of selecting measures appropriate to a specific technology within a specific educational context, not the empirical preferences of the maritime participants.

"Although real-time and automatic assessment are not appropriate in our MET context, they should not be dismissed outright for other contexts."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id framework-retains-automatic-assessment-heuristic-for-other-contexts
title The heuristic framework deliberately retains automatic performance checks opposed by instructors and students, as context-appropriate measure selection matters
description The heuristic framework deliberately retains automatic performance checks opposed by instructors and students, as context-appropriate measure selection matters
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — susan-harrington-and-charlott-sellberg-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.