Claims

Fresh Start pupils made more progress in literacy than control pupils after 22 weeks, with an overall effect size of +0.24

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 In a two-arm randomised controlled trial across 10 secondary schools, Year 7 pupils receiving Fresh Start for 22 weeks made more progress in literacy than control pupils, with an overall gain-score effect size of +0.24, equivalent to approximately 3 months of additional progress in reading age. → Stephen Gorard 2015

Evidence

Stephen Gorard 2015

Stephen Gorard, Nadia Siddiqui, Beng Huat See. (2015). Fresh Start Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581126

q2 · i1 · causal · r2

Two-arm school-led randomised controlled trial with 433 Year 7 pupils in 10 secondary schools, analysed by intention to treat using gain scores on GL Assessment's New Group Reading Test A and B. The report states "The overall effect size was +0.24", equivalent to about 3 months of additional reading progress.

"The FS pupils in the intervention group made more progress in literacy than the control group after 22 weeks. The overall effect size was +0.24 in terms of the gain between the scores in the test before the intervention"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.