Frustration was marginally significantly negatively correlated with learning outcomes, while boredom was unexpectedly positively correlated¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q2·i0–i1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 Frustration frequency was marginally significantly and negatively correlated with learning outcomes (r = −0.169, n = 100, p = 0.092). → DeFalco 2018
q2 i0 Boredom was unexpectedly positively correlated with learning outcomes (r = 0.200, n = 100, p = 0.046). → DeFalco 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
DeFalco 2018¶
DeFalco, J. A., Rowe, J. P., Paquette, L., Georgoulas-Sherry, V., Brawner, K., Mott, B. W., Baker, R. S., & Lester, J. C. (2018). Detecting and Addressing Frustration in a Serious Game for Military Training. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0152-1
q2 · i1 · associational · r1
Pearson correlations between BROMP-observed affect frequencies and learning gains in the Experiment 1 baseline study (119 cadets, mean learning = −0.04). Frustration showed a marginal negative correlation: "r = − 0.169, n =1 0 0 ,p = 0.092".
"However, frustration was marginally significant and negatively correlated with learning outcomes (frustration, r = − 0.169, n =1 0 0 ,p = 0.092)."
DeFalco 2018 (2)¶
DeFalco, J. A., Rowe, J. P., Paquette, L., Georgoulas-Sherry, V., Brawner, K., Mott, B. W., Baker, R. S., & Lester, J. C. (2018). Detecting and Addressing Frustration in a Serious Game for Military Training. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0152-1
q2 · i0 · associational · r1
Same correlational analysis of Experiment 1 data; boredom's positive correlation ("r =0 . 2 0 0", p = 0.046) was unexpected by the authors, while confusion, surprise, and engaged concentration correlations were not statistically significant.
"Unexpectedly, boredom was positively correlated with learning outcomes (boredom, r =0 . 2 0 0 ,n =1 0 0 , p = 0.046)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Emotions — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- After partialling out control variables, boredom and frustration during scaffolded learning negatively correlated with fadeout performance, while confusion↔frustration transitions and boredom→engagement transition positively correlated with it — related
- No significant impact of frustration or boredom (or anxiousness, discouragement, distractedness) on practice performance was found — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
frustration-negative-boredom-positive-learning-correlation |
title |
Frustration was marginally significantly negatively correlated with learning outcomes, while boredom was unexpectedly positively correlated |
description |
Frustration was marginally significantly negatively correlated with learning outcomes, while boredom was unexpectedly positively correlated |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — defalco-2018, defalco-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.