Claims

Multiple sufficient configurations lead to high AI literacy performance (equifinality)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? fsQCA identified three sufficient configurations for high performance, with solution coverage 0.588 and consistency 0.913. → Yu S 2026

Evidence

Yu S 2026

Yu S, Lin Y and Chen C (2026) Designing for AI literacy: psychological mechanisms and self-determination. Front. Psychol. 17:1937845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1937845

q2 · i? · causal · r2

fsQCA of the same 320 cases identified three sufficient configurations: TBI+STT+high competence, SBI+OET+high autonomy, and TBI+OET+high competence. Overall solution coverage 0.588, consistency 0.913, demonstrating equifinality.

"The three sufficient configurations are presented in Table 8. Their consistencies were 0.923, 0.896, and 0.941; raw coverages were 0.386, 0.357, and 0.458; and unique coverages were 0.089, 0.072, and 0.156. Overall solution coverage was 0.588 and overall solution consistency was 0.913."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id fsqca-multiple-pathways-high-ai-literacy
title Multiple sufficient configurations lead to high AI literacy performance (equifinality)
description Multiple sufficient configurations lead to high AI literacy performance (equifinality)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yu-s-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.