Dyads given the full Process Coordinator used the regulative tool about three times as long and twice as often as dyads with the empty version¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 PC+ dyads used the Process Coordinator significantly longer than PC− dyads (d=1.21) and more frequently (d=0.66). → Sarah Manlove 2007
Evidence¶
Sarah Manlove 2007¶
Sarah Manlove, Ard W. Lazonder & Ton de Jong. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9012-y
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
Quasi-experimental comparison of 20 PC+ versus 15 PC− dyads working an inquiry task in Co-Lab over five lessons; logfiles showed PC use "about three times as long and twice as much", with t tests and d=1.21 (time) and d=0.66 (frequency) as printed.
"On average, PC+ dyads used the Process Coordinator about three times as long and twice as much as PC − dyads did. Both differences were statistically significant (time: t(24.01)=3.78, p<0.01, d=1.21>; frequency: t(22.81)=2.08, p<0.05, d=0.66)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Empty-PC dyads built significantly better domain models than full-PC dyads, an effect concentrated among lower-achieving dyads — related
- Full-PC dyads wrote lab reports with significantly better structure and more complete content than empty-PC dyads — related
- In collaborative inquiry learning, dyads use more team regulation than task regulation in all support conditions — related
- RIDE communication instruction and RIDE plus CHT both increase team regulation relative to no support — related
- Higher model quality was associated with less goal viewing and note taking, while lab report scores correlated positively with regulative tool use and negatively with helpfile viewing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
full-pc-more-frequent-prolonged-regulative-tool-use |
title |
Dyads given the full Process Coordinator used the regulative tool about three times as long and twice as often as dyads with the empty version |
description |
Dyads given the full Process Coordinator used the regulative tool about three times as long and twice as often as dyads with the empty version |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sarah-manlove-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.