The full roster and full roster-plus methods are empirically similar¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The full roster method and the full roster-plus method produce empirically similar results when used to account for co-teaching in value-added models. → Eric Isenberg 2013
Evidence¶
Eric Isenberg 2013¶
Eric Isenberg, Elias Walsh. (2013). Accounting for Co-Teaching: A Guide for Policymakers and Developers of Value-Added Models. Working Paper 24, Chicago, IL: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/accounting-for-coteaching-a-guide-for-policymakers-and-developers-of-valueadded-models
q1 · i? · associational · r?
The paper's key findings report that the authors "show that the last two methods are empirically similar," referring to the full roster method and the full roster-plus method. No effect sizes, statistics, or data description are printed in the available text.
"The authors discuss why the first two methods are impractical, and show that the last two methods are empirically similar."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Applying the Full Roster-Plus Method instead of the Full Roster Method produces very small empirical differences in value-added estimates in District of Columbia Public Schools data — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The Teacher Team Method and Full Roster Method produce similar estimates of teacher value added — related
- The Full Roster Method effectively counts co-taught students more than once in value-added calculations — related
- The Full Roster-Plus Method gives co-taught students full weight with their teachers while all students contribute equally to the student-characteristics and achievement relationship — related
- The Full Roster Method offers the most promise for robust, practical implementation among the three co-teaching value-added methods considered. — related
- The Teacher Team Method and Full Roster Method provide a more stable approach than the Partial Credit Method for estimating teacher effects when students have multiple teachers for the same subject. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
full-roster-methods-empirically-similar |
title |
The full roster and full roster-plus methods are empirically similar |
description |
The full roster and full roster-plus methods are empirically similar |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — eric-isenberg-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.