States draw on federal, state, and local funding sources to develop and sustain statewide leadership initiatives¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Statewide leadership development initiatives are funded through a mix of federal, state, and local sources, with initiatives frequently administered through the state department of education but sometimes funded by the state and administered by higher education institutions, nonprofits, regional agencies, or the governor's office. → Fitz 2024

Evidence¶

Fitz 2024¶

Fitz, J., Wechsler, M. E., & Levin, S. (2024). State approaches to developing educational leaders. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/795.572

q1 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive finding from the report's overview and funding sections, which briefly describe the federal, state, and local funding sources states draw on to develop and sustain these initiatives. The truncated text does not include the detailed funding table contents.

"State leadership development initiatives are frequently administered through the state department of education, but in some cases they are funded by the state and administered by institutions of higher education, nonprofits, regional educational service agencies, the governor's office, or by partnerships between multiple entities."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• At least 26 states supported ongoing statewide leadership development initiatives for in-service leaders as of 2022–23 — related
• State leadership initiatives most commonly take the form of cohort-based academies or institutes serving principals, with other roles served less often — related
• Induction program administration, structures, and funding vary widely across California, with advertised costs from $0 to $10,000 and no dedicated state funding — related
• County-administered QRIS in California is voluntary, uneven, and destabilized by time-limited categorical funding — related
• Oakland Unified sustained its full-service community schools initiative through leadership turnover and lean funding by engaging stakeholders, braiding funding sources, and enacting formal policy commitments — related
• Federal IDEA funding has provided only about 15 percent of the national average per-pupil expenditure, versus the 40 percent originally promised — related
• State administrators report using external entities such as regional centers and nonprofits to extend school improvement capacity and reach local needs — related
• The report provides an overview of federal support for state apprenticeship systems and variation across states in key characteristics — related
• Direct service providers and statewide nonprofits play indispensable connector roles between youth needs and policy in both states — related
• State investments in community schools range from $3.4 million to $4.1 billion, mostly occurring within the past 3 years, drawing on state funds, federal ESSER funds, or both. — related