Claims

Prior implementation studies and a single-case design indicate FUSION is a feasible, usable Tier 2 intervention with promise for improving student math achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Implementation studies suggest FUSION is feasible and usable in authentic educational settings. → Strand Cary 2013 q2 i? A single-case design study indicates the promise of FUSION to improve student math achievement. → Strand Cary 2013

Evidence

Strand Cary 2013

Strand Cary, M., Doabler, C., Clarke, B., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., & Jungjohann, K. (2013). Evaluating the Promise of the FUSION Tier 2 Math Intervention. SREE Spring 2013 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563132

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The authors summarize their own Year 1 brief learning trials and Year 2 feasibility study, reporting that FUSION proved "feasible and usable Tier 2 intervention" in authentic school settings; no effect sizes are printed.

"Previous findings from the project's implementation studies suggest that FUSION is a feasible and usable Tier 2 intervention that can be implemented in authentic educational settings."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.