Claims

Middle school students with reading disabilities taught Fusion Reading significantly outperformed matched comparison students on the overall GRADE reading measure after Year 1 (Hedges's g = 1.66)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In a quasi-experimental matched comparison study of 40 sixth-grade special education students, the Fusion Reading group showed significantly greater improvement than the Corrective Reading comparison group on the overall GRADE score over one year, with Hedges's g = 1.66. → Hock 2017

Evidence

Hock 2017

Hock, M. F., Brasseur-Hock, I. F., Hock, A. J., & Duvel, B. (2017). The Effects of a Comprehensive Reading Program on Reading Outcomes for Middle School Students With Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415618495

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Repeated-measures ANCOVA in a quasi-experimental matched comparison group design with 20 Fusion Reading and 20 Corrective Reading students, controlling for gender, race, SES, disability severity, school, and classroom. The group-by-time interaction was significant, "F(1, 32) = 6.67, p = .015, Hedges’s g = 1.66".

"An RM ANCOVA was conducted on the overall GRADE scores. There were significant differences between the intervention and comparison group over time, F(1, 32) = 6.67, p = .015, Hedges’s g = 1.66 (see Table 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.