Students exposed to the Generalisation Assessment Game had significantly less religious prejudice than students not exposed¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students exposed to GAG had significantly less religious prejudice than students not exposed (independent t test, t = -2.715, p = 0.0082). → Obiekezie and Timothy 2015

Evidence¶

Obiekezie and Timothy 2015¶

Eucharia Obiageli Obiekezie & Alexander Essien Timothy. (2015). Fostering Ethnic and Religious Harmony through Classroom Language Experiences. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078506

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent t-test comparison of post-test religious prejudice between control (mean 23.9) and experimental (mean 27.8) groups, 38 students each, in the University of Calabar International Secondary School study. The article reports "a calculated t of -2.715 and a p – value of 0.0082". No effect size printed.

"The result as shown in table 3 indicated a calculated t of -2.715 and a p – value of 0.0082. Therefore, there was evidence that students exposed to the Generalis ation Assessment Game had significantly less religious prejudice than those not exposed."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Control students showed no significant change in ethnic or religious prejudice from pre-test to post-test — related
• Students exposed to the Generalisation Assessment Game had significantly less ethnic prejudice than students not exposed — related
• Within the experimental group, ethnic and religious prejudice scores improved significantly from pre-test to post-test after playing GAG — related
• Building Empathy Improves Intergroup Attitudes — a broader claim this one bears on