Interviews revealed six themes: enhanced efficiency, improved quality, facilitated reflection, increased interaction, improved collaboration, and concerns about over-reliance¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Semi-structured interviews with 10 experimental-group students identified six recurring themes covering both advantages (efficiency, quality, reflection, interaction, collaboration) and challenges (over-reliance, ethical concerns). → Wei 2025

Evidence¶

Wei 2025¶

Wei, X., Wang, L., Lee, L.-K., & Liu, R. (2025). The effects of generative AI on collaborative problem-solving and team creativity performance in digital story creation: an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00526-0

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative thematic analysis of 30-minute semi-structured interviews with 10 randomly selected experimental-group students. The article reports students "highlighted their role in enhancing DST projects' efficiency, fostering deeper reflection and interaction, and improving DST projects' quality" while concerns about over-reliance also emerged.

"students recognized the advantages of GAI tools and highlighted their role in enhancing DST projects' efficiency, fostering deeper reflection and interaction, and improving DST projects' quality. However, concerns regarding over-reliance on GAI and ethical considerations also emerged"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• GAI-assisted DST creation significantly enhanced all five CPS sub-dimensions compared to traditional methods — related
• GAI-assisted DST creation produced significantly better team creativity performance than traditional methods, particularly in novelty and user experience — related
• Students remained cautious about relying on GenAI throughout the creative process, citing imperfect outputs and perceived loss of ownership — related
• Student experiences with GenAI in design thinking fall into four themes: perceived benefits, ethical concerns, hesitance and acceptance, and critical validation — related
• University students held positive attitudes toward GAI in DST creation but expressed moderate concern about over-reliance and low concern about reduced social interaction — related
• Students express concerns about GenAI, with non-users (never/rarely) significantly more concerned than other users, and concerns uncorrelated with knowledge — related
• Positive attitudes toward ChatGPT increased from before to during the practicum — related
• Qualitative themes: efficiency and peer influence drive AI use, while confidence and rule ambiguity shape students' perceptions of dependence — related
• Experimental-group students detected AI errors and enacted verification and ethical self-regulation as routine practices — related
• GAI-assisted DST creation produced significantly higher collaborative problem-solving skills than traditional methods among university students — related
• University philosophy teachers prioritize fostering students' intellectual growth over transmitting content — related