A gap exists between prescriptive readings on learner-generated drawing and research-based understandings¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2005 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The review finds that prescriptive readings on learner-generated drawing diverge from research-based understandings of the strategy. → Van Meter 2005

Evidence¶

Van Meter 2005¶

Van Meter, P., Garner, J. (2005). The Promise and Practice of Learner-Generated Drawing: Literature Review and Synthesis. Educ Psychol Rev 17, 285–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3

q2 · i? · review · r?

This is the review's own synthesis of applied and empirical literature on learner-generated drawing, which it states reveals "the gap that exists between prescriptive readings on learner-generated drawing and research-based understandings." No effect size is reported.

"Clear from this review is the gap that exists between prescriptive readings on learner-generated drawing and research-based understandings."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Instructional design models are rarely tested against outcomes; their credibility comes from practitioners finding them useful. — related
• In CSCL written civic discussions, gaps exist between a composer's emotion labeling and others' emotion recognition — related
• Self-reports of achievement goal orientations diverge markedly from traced goal orientations, which predict reading achievement while self-reports do not — related
• Even prescriptives based on the strongest evidence for causality are fraught with generalization problems, per a meeting of educational researchers — related