The review identifies gaps in existing evaluative approaches for physical learning environments¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Analysis of existing evaluative approaches for physical learning environments reveals gaps that current methods do not address. → Benjamin Cleveland & Kenn Fisher 2014

Evidence¶

Benjamin Cleveland & Kenn Fisher 2014¶

Benjamin Cleveland & Kenn Fisher. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: a critical review of the literature. Learning Environ Res 17, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3

q2 · i? · review · r?

This is the review's synthesis finding, reported in its abstract: "Gaps in these evaluative approaches are identified" following the critical analysis of higher education and school evaluation approaches. The identification is the authors' critical judgment from literature analysis; no quantitative evidence is reported.

"Gaps in these evaluative approaches are identified and an argument is put forward for the evaluation of physical learning environments from a more rigorous pedagogical perspective."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Existing approaches to evaluating higher education and school learning environments fall short when judged against contemporary approaches to teaching and learning — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• CAI-in-education research shows a framework gap: no end-to-end design guidance, weak CAI-specific usability methods, unclear pedagogical guidance, and limited AI literacy support — related
• The review identifies gaps in the measurement and analysis of TSE in the educational literature — related