No training studies exist for open appendicectomy and no assessment studies for open appendicectomy and open rectal surgery¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? No training studies were identified for open appendicectomy, and no studies describing assessment in open appendicectomy and rectal surgery were identified. → Hertz P 2024
Evidence¶
Hertz P 2024¶
Hertz P , Rattenborg S , Haug TR , Houlind K , Konge L , Bjerrum F . (2024). Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy– a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16905
q2 · i? · review · r3
Systematic review of training and assessment literature across all three surgical approaches. The review reports that "No training studies were identified for open appendicectomy, which all gastrointestinal surgeons should master."
"No training studies were identified for open appendicectomy, which all gastrointestinal surgeons should master."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Laparoscopic assessment tools dominate while open and robotic assessment tools are scarce — a broader claim this one bears on
- Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendicectomy than for colorectal procedures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.