Gaze behavior shows distinct tracking modes: angular discrepancies engage both external target tracking and self-monitoring, whereas speed discrepancies engage predominantly self-referential monitoring¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? During angular perturbations, both gaze-to-target distance and gaze-to-user distance scaled proportionally with discrepancy magnitude. → Inmaculada Márquez & Mario Treviño 2025 q3 i? During speed perturbations, participants predominantly increased self-monitoring (GUD) while gaze-to-target distance remained largely unaffected. → Inmaculada Márquez & Mario Treviño 2025 (2)

Evidence¶

Inmaculada Márquez & Mario Treviño 2025¶

Inmaculada Márquez & Mario Treviño. (2025). Dissociable sensory, motor, and visuomotor predictive functions. npj Science of Learning 10:85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00377-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Eye-tracking analysis (60 Hz binocular gaze) during the interception task with angular discrepancies: GTD and GUD amplitudes and AUCs both scaled significantly with discrepancy magnitude, described as "a coordinated use of visual prediction and motor monitoring".

"These results indicate that both externally and internally oriented gaze behavior con- tributed to compensatory responses during angular perturbations, reflecting a coordinated use of visual prediction and motor monitoring (Fig.2a)."

Inmaculada Márquez & Mario Treviño 2025 (2)¶

Inmaculada Márquez & Mario Treviño. (2025). Dissociable sensory, motor, and visuomotor predictive functions. npj Science of Learning 10:85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00377-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Eye-tracking analysis under speed discrepancies: GUD increased strongly and significantly with magnitude while GTD slopes were non-significant, suggesting engagement of "self-referential monitor- ing". Gaze velocity and pupil diameter showed no reliable changes.

"These findings indicate that speed perturbations engage self-referential monitor- ing, possibly re flecting increased reliance on proprioceptive feedback or internal velocity estimation (Fig.2b)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Angular and speed perturbations in a visuomotor interception task engage distinct adaptive strategies: spatial correction for angular errors and velocity-based adjustment for speed errors — related
• Detection of motion discrepancies increases with both perturbation magnitude and duration, with response times decreasing with magnitude — related