GCL ratings move opposite to the hypothesised pattern, decreasing in the increasing-complexity condition and increasing in the decreasing-complexity condition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 In the increasing condition, GCL ratings decreased across units (F(1.82, 94.66) = 43.55, ηp² = 0.46), disconfirming H3a. → Krieglstein 2025
q3 i3 In the decreasing condition, GCL ratings increased across units (F(2, 92) = 44.63, ηp² = 0.49), disconfirming H3b. → Krieglstein 2025
Evidence¶
Krieglstein 2025¶
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Wesenberg, L., Rey, G. D., & Schneider, S. (2025). The Distorting Influence of Primacy Effects on Reporting Cognitive Load in Learning Materials of Varying Complexity. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09980-0
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Repeated-measures ANOVAs on during-learning GCL ratings. Increasing condition: F(1.82, 94.66) = 43.55, ηp² = 0.46 (Huynh–Feldt correction, ε = 0.88); descriptives confirmed a decrease, so hypothesis 3a was not confirmed. Decreasing condition: F(2, 92) = 44.63, ηp² = 0.49; descriptives confirmed an increase, disconfirming 3b.
"a repeated-measures ANOVA including the three GCL assessments during learning was significant, F(1.82, 94.66) = 43.55, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.46."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Delayed post-learning assessments of ICL, ECL, and GCL do not differ between increasing and decreasing complexity sequences — related
- ECL ratings also follow the complexity sequence, rising in the increasing condition and falling in the decreasing condition, though ECL was not manipulated — related
- ICL ratings track the manipulated complexity sequence: increasing across units in the increasing condition and decreasing in the decreasing condition — related
- Delayed cognitive load assessments after learning exceed the average of during-learning assessments only when complexity decreases across the learning material — related
- Pre-study verified that the three learning units differ in perceived complexity in the intended low, medium, and high ordering — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
gcl-ratings-opposite-hypothesized-pattern |
title |
GCL ratings move opposite to the hypothesised pattern, decreasing in the increasing-complexity condition and increasing in the decreasing-complexity condition |
description |
GCL ratings move opposite to the hypothesised pattern, decreasing in the increasing-complexity condition and increasing in the decreasing-complexity condition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — krieglstein-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.