Six AI tutors individually matched human tutoring, with Gemma 4 31B equivalent at 918× lower cost per percentage point of learning gain¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Gemma 4 31B achieved learning gains statistically equivalent to expert human tutoring (p=.044) at 918× lower cost per percentage point of learning gain. → Curtis Northcutt 2026
Evidence¶
Curtis Northcutt 2026¶
Curtis Northcutt, Inaara Hasmani, Kevin Feng, Trevor Khangi, Andreas Plesner, Jonas Mueller. (2026). StudentBench: AI and human tutoring yield equivalent GRE learning gains. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28470 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.28470
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Individual equivalence tests against human tutoring across the 12 AI tutors; "Gemma 4 31B achieved GRE learning gains equivalent to expert human tutoring (p=.044)", with mean inference cost of $0.067 per session reported elsewhere. No standardized effect size printed.
"We test whether each AI tutor’s learning gains are equivalent to human tutoring, and find that Gemma 4 31B achieved GRE learning gains equivalent to expert human tutoring (p=.044) at918× lower cost per percentage point of learning gain."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both AI and human tutoring produce larger GRE learning gains than a no-tutoring control — related
- Pooled AI tutoring produces statistically equivalent GRE learning gains to expert human tutoring — related
- Model family and instruction-tuning approach appear better predictors of tutoring quality than parameter count alone — related
- The best AI tutors exceeded human mean learning gains in Quantitative domains while human tutoring led pooled AI means in all Verbal domains — related
- In Quantitative AI sessions, faster AI replies were associated with more engagement, more correct practice, and larger learning gains; these associations were not significant in Verbal — related
- Intelligent tutoring systems improve achievement over non-individualised instruction — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
gemma-4-31b-equivalent-human-tutoring-918x-cheaper |
title |
Six AI tutors individually matched human tutoring, with Gemma 4 31B equivalent at 918× lower cost per percentage point of learning gain |
description |
Six AI tutors individually matched human tutoring, with Gemma 4 31B equivalent at 918× lower cost per percentage point of learning gain |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — curtis-northcutt-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.